Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com" <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()
Date: 2021-11-02 15:39:38
Message-ID: 70D9E105-CC9C-4D7F-BD63-133FCF3E4197@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/2/21, 8:36 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I've pushed the SyncPostCheckpoint change, and I think I'm going
> to stop here. It's not clear that the remaining list_delete_first
> callers have any real problem; and changing them would be complex.
> We can revisit the question if we find out there is an issue.
> Or, if somebody else wants to pursue the issue, feel free.

Thanks!

Nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-11-02 15:50:47 Re: [PATCH] fix references to like_regex
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-11-02 15:35:55 Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()