From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Przemysław Wójcik <jan(dot)przemyslaw(dot)wojcik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: Fwd: [BUGS] pg_trgm word_similarity inconsistencies or bug |
Date: | 2018-03-01 20:05:54 |
Message-ID: | 708593ed-1104-a0d2-56b7-097adfdcfc16@pgmasters.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alexander,
On 1/4/18 4:25 PM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>
> I just found that patch apply is failed according to
> commitfest.cputube.org <http://commitfest.cputube.org>. I think it's
> because I sent only second patch from patchset in last message.
> Anyway I resend both patches rebased to current master.
I agree with Teodor (upthread, not quoted here) that the documentation
could use some editing.
I started to do it myself, but quickly realized I have no knowledge of
the content. I'm afraid I would destroy the meaning while updating the
grammar.
Anyone understand the subject matter well enough to review the
documentation?
Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-03-01 20:39:18 | Re: Index-only scan returns incorrect results when using a composite GIST index with a gist_trgm_ops column. |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-03-01 19:43:22 | Re: TO_DATE Function unintended behavior when month value is greater than 12 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2018-03-01 20:14:41 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks |
Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2018-03-01 20:02:20 | Re: [PATCH] Opclass parameters |