Quick Links

Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Marek Szuba <marecki(at)gentoo(dot)org>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Date:	2021-08-13 15:09:04
Message-ID:	70848.1628867344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Marek Szuba <marecki(at)gentoo(dot)org> writes:
> Tested against PostgreSQL 13.3 on a physical rv64gc system (BeagleV
> Starlight beta board) - builds and installs fine, all tests pass.

Cool ... I had hoped to acquire one of those myself, but I didn't
make the cut.

regards, tom lane

In response to

[PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V at 2021-08-13 11:54:52 from Marek Szuba

Responses

Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V at 2021-08-13 15:30:01 from Andres Freund

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andres Freund	2021-08-13 15:30:01	Re: [PATCH] Native spinlock support on RISC-V
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2021-08-13 14:45:38	Re: pg_settings.pending_restart not set when line removed