Re: bison news

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bison news
Date: 2002-08-20 20:34:10
Message-ID: 7071.1029875650@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, now that _a_ bison exists that works, how does this effect our
> release? I don't see preproc.[ch] in CVS. Do we need this new bison
> version on postgresql.org because Marc generates these as part of his
> install script?

I don't think we want a beta bison on postgres.org. Let's see if we can
hold out for a release...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-20 20:36:09 Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL (fwd)
Previous Message Neil Conway 2002-08-20 20:31:50 Re: @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003: Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL (fwd)