From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser |
Date: | 2024-03-11 06:43:17 |
Message-ID: | 70705cf3-c875-d489-c6a9-7dd61f1dc1af@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-03-07 Th 22:42, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Top-level scalars like `false` or `12345` do not parse correctly if
>> the chunk size is too small; instead json_errdetail() reports 'Token
>> "" is invalid'. With small chunk sizes, json_errdetail() additionally
>> segfaults on constructions like `[tru]` or `12zz`.
>
>
> Ugh. Will investigate.
I haven't managed to reproduce this. But I'm including some tests for it.
>
>
>
>
> I'll have a fresh patch set soon which will also take care of the bitrot.
>
>
>
See attached.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v9-0001-Introduce-a-non-recursive-JSON-parser.patch | text/x-patch | 424.6 KB |
v9-0002-Add-support-for-incrementally-parsing-backup-mani.patch | text/x-patch | 8.1 KB |
v9-0003-Use-incremental-parsing-of-backup-manifests.patch | text/x-patch | 11.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-03-11 06:56:15 | Re: Properly pathify the union planner |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-03-11 06:30:30 | Re: Using the %m printf format more |