| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Rasmussen <michaelr(at)porch(dot)com>, Francis Fish <francis(dot)fish(at)pharmarketeer(dot)com>, Andreas <maps(dot)on(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgadmin-support(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: I'd like a lightweight alternative to pgAdmin4 ? |
| Date: | 2017-10-13 06:54:36 |
| Message-ID: | 706CFEE2-6F20-4998-B37A-AA8E34A0CF77@pgadmin.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> On 13 Oct 2017, at 05:16, Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 2017-10-12 15:59, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>> I would suggest keep trying pgAdmin 4 and reporting on issues, so
>> progress towards making it the tool we want it to be.
>
> It won't happen, choices have been made that preclude it from ever being
> a fast, lightweight native app. "Stable", "Fast", and "Features" have
> been redefined; this project does not have the same goals as the
> previous one.
Correct. pgAdmin 4 is now provably significantly faster than pgAdmin 3 where it counts the most (query tool), and has far few known issues - not one universally repeatable crash bug that we know of, compared to various unfixable ones in pgAdmin 3.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Klimenko | 2017-10-13 11:35:00 | 500 Internal Server Error |
| Previous Message | Darren Duncan | 2017-10-13 05:45:00 | Re: I'd like a lightweight alternative to pgAdmin4 ? |