From: | "Douglas, Ryan" <RDouglas(at)arbinet(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 |
Date: | 2009-10-16 05:27:40 |
Message-ID: | 706C25916A1ADD489F69906EC24FC07E026FDE93@vamail02.TheXchange.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Both actually...
When just the "return" is commented out the routine goes into a loop and
the following shows up in the logs...
<rdouglas(at)tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG:
could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
<rdouglas(at)tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG:
could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
<rdouglas(at)tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG:
could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
<rdouglas(at)tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG:
could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer
When just "ereport" is commented out I still get a sigfault...
<[unknown](at)[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:13:49.211 EDT>LOG: connection
received: host=10.0.20.38 port=32815
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.258 EDT>LOG: server process (PID 13201) was
terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.258 EDT>LOG: terminating any other active
server processes
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.262 EDT>LOG: all server processes terminated;
reinitializing
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.381 EDT>LOG: database system was interrupted;
last known up at 2009-10-16 01:13:37 EDT
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.382 EDT>LOG: database system was not properly
shut down; automatic recovery in progress
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.382 EDT>LOG: record with zero length at
3/B7D75538
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.383 EDT>LOG: redo is not required
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.409 EDT>LOG: autovacuum launcher started
<@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.410 EDT>LOG: database system is ready to accept
connections
But when both are commented it seems to work...
<[unknown](at)[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:15:05.330 EDT>LOG: connection
received: host=10.0.20.38 port=32816
<[unknown](at)[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:15:17.436 EDT>LOG: connection
received: host=10.0.20.38 port=32817
<rdouglas(at)tacacs 10.0.20.38(32817) 2009-10-16 01:15:17.486 EDT>LOG:
connection authorized: user=rdouglas database=tacacs
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 1:01 AM
To: Douglas, Ryan
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5
"Douglas, Ryan" <RDouglas(at)arbinet(dot)com> writes:
> Ok... I compiled 8.2.14 and 8.3.8 with the same configure options.
They
> both segfaut when doing the authentication. Note that when I use -W
> option with psql everything works ok. I went back to 8.4.1 enabled
the
> max debug level then re-tested and got the info below in the log. I
went
> to line 769 in pqcomm.c and commented the ereport and return EOF lines
> and recompiled. Now when I connect it works without a segfault. Hope
> this narrows things down.
Which is it that makes the difference ... the ereport or the return?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Muris Pucic | 2009-10-16 07:26:14 | BUG #5122: Subqueries - inner select statement bug |
Previous Message | Douglas, Ryan | 2009-10-16 04:54:59 | Re: BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 |