From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sleep functions |
Date: | 2005-08-22 14:58:42 |
Message-ID: | 7066b7c826c4a7559418e734d6ce6703@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> In any case, I wonder how many people, not having a sleep() function,
> effect a delay with a busy loop; an example of such has been posted
> in response to the thread in pgsql-admin, and didn't the regression
> tests do so until recently? That seems less desirable than a real
> sleep().
Exactly. If people are going to do it anyways, we might as well provide
a better interface. And sleep() is going to be less expensive than
any home-brewed sleep simulation.
> To others who've written their own sleep() function: what are you
> using it for?
To properly emulate other, slower, RDBMSs? :)
To simulate long-running queries without actually invoking them, and
to simulate concurrency of shorter queries.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200508221055
https://www.biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEARECAAYFAkMJ5/QACgkQvJuQZxSWSsi7DwCfcVKyclkFZ5swp/jBvrT3lwq8
P4cAnRh/1WwCAwM/v2bItKKJBMD8ARNT
=itDC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-22 15:53:22 | Re: Sleep functions |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-08-22 14:49:06 | Re: Sleep functions |