From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Date: | 2009-04-21 17:07:25 |
Message-ID: | 7065.1240333645@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> The problem is I don't see curly braces used anywhere in \?
> I see it in 8.3:
> : \d{t|i|s|v|S} [PATTERN] (add "+" for more detail)
> : list tables/indexes/sequences/views/system tables
Yeah. The only reason that \d[tisv] doesn't have a similar issue
is that someone has dumbed down its entries to the point of being
flat-out incorrect. I trust we will not be equally bad about \df.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-04-21 17:07:58 | Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df |
Previous Message | Korry Douglas | 2009-04-21 17:05:06 | Re: [ADMIN] License Issue |