From: | "Joel Jacobson" <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Nathan Bossart" <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add ACL (Access Control List) acronym |
Date: | 2024-06-24 20:49:11 |
Message-ID: | 703a08f1-4a8b-4d2e-a36e-0515a8632218@app.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 21:51, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:46 PM Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2024, at 18:02, David G. Johnston wrote:
>>
>> > The page we link to uses "permissions" while we consistently use
>> > "privileges" to describe the contents of the list. This seems like an
>> > obvious synonym, but as the point of these is to formally define
>> > things, pointing this equivalence is worth considering.
>>
>> I like this idea. How could this be implemented in the docs? Maybe a <note>...</note> for ACL in acronyms.sgml?
>>
>
> Add a second <para> under the one holding the link?
How about?
+ <para>
+ The linked page uses "permissions" while we consistently use the synonym
+ "privileges", to describe the contents of the list. For avoidance of
+ doubt and clarity, these two terms are equivalent in the
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> documentation.
+ </para>
/Joel
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Add-ACL-Access-Control-List-acronym.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2024-06-24 20:49:13 | Re: Partial aggregates pushdown |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2024-06-24 20:42:11 | Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin |