Re: Question about the enum type

From: Tim Hart <tjhart(at)mac(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Question about the enum type
Date: 2008-02-18 06:26:07
Message-ID: 70326e4da0629ad3f8841234ceff7fb0@mac.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Feb 18, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Would it have been reasonable to expect some kind of notice or warning
>> message stating that 'position' was special, and
>> <double-quote>position<double-quote> would be used instead?
>
> The way you phrase that makes me think you misunderstand what's
> happening here. The name of the type isn't "position" with double
> quotes, it's just position. You have to double-quote it when you
> use it to prevent the parser from thinking that the special SQL
> POSITION function call syntax is coming up. There are other ways
> to do that though, for example if you write public.position (or
> whatever
> schema it's in) then you won't need double quotes.

I did misunderstand. I understand now that the quotes are used to call
out the string literally, and to avoid syntax-related parsing. Thanks
for the help.

Tim

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikko Partio 2008-02-18 07:15:01 SPI-functions and transaction control
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-02-18 06:25:14 Re: DB design: How to store object properties?