Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0
Date: 2008-06-27 17:24:56
Message-ID: 70324AF2-C8F7-4A38-9042-A12614D639D1@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 26, 2008, at 13:59, Tom Lane wrote:

> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> So, are your certain about this?
>
> See Turkish --- in that locale i and I are not an upper/lower pair,
> instead they pair with some non-ASCII letters. There are likely
> other cases but that's the counterexample I remember.

Perfect, thank you. I was able to add a failing test and make it pass
by removing the string length optimization.

For future reference of anyone reading the list, this page has a great
description of the problem:

http://www.i18nguy.com/unicode/turkish-i18n.html

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Urbański 2008-06-27 17:39:24 Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2008-06-27 17:14:15 Re: Vacuuming leaked temp tables (once again)