From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Date: | 2007-03-06 18:44:25 |
Message-ID: | 7004.1173206665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> But when I say
> CREATE TABLE ( a int PRIMARY KEY, ... ) PARTITION blah ...
> then I expect that the primary key will be enforced across all
> partitions. We currently sidestep that issue by not offering seemingly
> transparent partitioning. But if you are planning to offer that, the
> unique index issue needs to be solved, and I see nothing in your plan
> about that.
Agreed, it needs to Just Work. I think it'd still be useful though
if we only support auto-partitioning on the primary key, and that
restriction avoids the indexing problem.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-06 18:44:31 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-06 18:43:45 | Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-06 18:44:31 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-03-06 18:35:19 | Re: Auto creation of Partitions |