Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API
Date: 2018-11-25 20:49:19
Message-ID: 7003801543178959@sas1-46c84f197234.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

> Why don't we put recovery entries into postgresql.recovery.conf or such?
> And overwrite rather than append?
Appending to postgressql.auto.conf instead of writing new hardcoded file was proposed here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQ-Grduc-0WSsK4-VXo%2B1CB%3DyDS9NMU0NEp%2Bc%2Bffnz0UQ%40mail.gmail.com

regards, Sergei

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-11-25 20:53:19 Re: pgsql: Add WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH pseudo-event.
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2018-11-25 20:48:35 Re: Continue work on changes to recovery.conf API