Re: review: psql command copy count tag

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Khandekar <amit(dot)khandekar(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: review: psql command copy count tag
Date: 2014-03-10 04:37:10
Message-ID: 7001.1394426230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> writes:
> This has been in Ready for committer stage for long time.

Yeah, I started to work on it and got distracted, but was working on it
some more yesterday. As submitted, it leaks PGresults, and makes some
inconsistent and mostly undocumented changes in the APIs of the psql
functions involved. But I'm pretty close to having something committable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-03-10 05:08:30 Re: [review] PostgreSQL Service on Windows does not start if data directory given is relative path
Previous Message Rajeev rastogi 2014-03-10 04:15:09 Re: review: psql command copy count tag