Re: Python 3.1 support

From: Nathan Boley <npboley(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-18 16:43:14
Message-ID: 6fa3b6e20911180843i696b8840r5749a28c0a073926@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Again, I'm only one user.  But so far I haven't seen anyone else speak
> up here, and clearly accepting this for inclusion will need nontrivial
> convincing.

Well, FWIW, I am excited about better type integration.

Also, I am a little skeptical about this patch. I am sorry if this has
already been discussed, but would this mean that I need to choose
whether pl/python is built against Python 2.* or Python 3.*?

-Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-18 17:06:58 Re: Python 3.1 support
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2009-11-18 15:52:17 Re: Very bad FTS performance with the Polish config