From: | Daniel Kellenberger <Daniel(dot)Kellenberger(at)netcetera(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: json_to_recordset not working with camelcase json keys |
Date: | 2015-12-17 07:56:08 |
Message-ID: | 6f30a05b5a61458aa89c2d9b033aeb1a@exchange01.one.nca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Joe
Thanks for your answer, this solved our issue.
In one project we are currently switching from Oracle to PostgreSQL and are excited about the database.
Kind regards,
Daniel
--
Our software sets the course: http://nca.me/software
Daniel Kellenberger | daniel(dot)kellenberger(at)netcetera(dot)com | T +41 44 297 58 14 |
Netcetera AG | 8040 Zürich | Switzerland | http://netcetera.com |
________________________________________
Von: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Dezember 2015 00:17
An: Daniel Kellenberger; pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Betreff: Re: [BUGS] json_to_recordset not working with camelcase json keys
On 12/15/2015 01:46 PM, Daniel Kellenberger wrote:
> We tried to extract from a json with camel case keys values, but
> unfortunatelly they are not mapped.
>
> Testcase: (PostgreSQL 9.4.5)
>
> select * from
> json_to_recordset('[{"aB":1,"bC":"foo"},{"aB":"2","cD":"bar"}]') as x(aB
> int, bC text);
Not a bug, I believe. You probably meant this:
select * from json_to_recordset('[{"aB":1,"bC":"foo"},
{"aB":"2","cD":"bar"}]')
as x("aB" int, "bC" text, "cD" text);
aB | bC | cD
----+-----+-----
1 | foo |
2 | | bar
(2 rows)
Unquoted identifiers are lowercased in postgres, so for camel case
identifiers you would need double quotes.
HTH,
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marcin Sieńko | 2015-12-17 08:53:21 | Re: BUG #13817: Query planner strange choose while select/count small part of big table - complete |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-12-16 23:15:31 | Re: BUG #13666: REASSIGN OWNED BY doesn't affect the relation underlying composite type |