| From: | ntr <kfeezh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew <archa(at)pacific(dot)net(dot)au>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: UUID datatype |
| Date: | 2008-02-16 16:06:56 |
| Message-ID: | 6e6cc3bc0802160806o6e686b15jbea6cc3e7b36ccbd@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
java.util.UUID and UUID in PG they are different things.
it's better to map THAT to a PGuuid class!
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Andrew wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering about the timeline or plans if any for JDBC driver support
> of
> > the recently added UUID datatype in PostgreSQL?
>
> There aren't any exact plans, but I was thinking we would map the pg uuid
> type onto the java.util.UUID type. The only problem with that
> is java.util.UUID only appeared in the 1.5 JDK, so we'd only be
> able to support it for some driver versions. Do people think it's better
> to always map it to a PGuuid class?
>
> Kris Jurka
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-16 16:08:22 | Re: UUID datatype |
| Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2008-02-16 15:57:38 | Re: extra rowcopy in ResultSet allways needed ?. |