Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS

From: "Hideyuki Kawashima" <kawasima(at)cs(dot)tsukuba(dot)ac(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
Date: 2007-03-08 21:17:46
Message-ID: 6de6f670703081317k6089951er573ba99c4b13b17c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon,

> Not checkpointing at all is not a good plan, since this will lead to an
> enormous build up of WAL files and a very long recovery time if the
> system does fail.

I appreciate your detailed comments.
Following your comments, I revised the problem.
Sigres-0.1.3 does checkpointings.

In summary, the features of Sigres-0.1.3 are as follows.
0: 10% faster than conventional PostgreSQL under tmpfs.
1: Checkpointings are continually executed.
2: Sigres mode is in default (the mode can be turned off via postgresql.conf).
3: issue_xlog_sync is called only by bgwriter (continually, via
createcheckpoint)
4: The entity of XLogWrite (_XLogWrite in my code) is called by both
backends and a bgwriter.
For each backend, _XLogWrite is called only via AdvanceXLInsertBuffer.
For a bgwriter, _XLogWrite is called via CreateCheckPoint.

Please try it if you have interest.
http://sourceforge.jp/projects/sigres/

Again, I really appreciate beneficial comments from this community !

Regards,

-- Hideyuki

--
Hideyuki Kawashima (Ph.D.)
University of Tsukuba
Assistant Professor

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shane Ambler 2007-03-08 22:01:10 Re: Auto creation of Partitions
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-03-08 21:09:13 Re: Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch