Re: Guidelines for GSoC student proposals / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions

From: "Mengxing Liu" <liu-mx15(at)mails(dot)tsinghua(dot)edu(dot)cn>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Guidelines for GSoC student proposals / Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions
Date: 2017-03-22 07:24:50
Message-ID: 6d5ba2fa.346fc.15af4e76921.Coremail.liu-mx15@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Kevin.

I've finished a draft proposal for "Eliminate O(N^2) scaling from rw-conflict tracking in serializable transactions". You can find it from GSOC website or by the link below.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17TAs3EJIokwPU7UTUmnlVY3ElB-VHViyX1zkQJmrD1A/edit?usp=sharing

I was wondering if you have time to review the proposal and give me some comments?

> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Kevin Grittner" <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
> Sent Time: 2017-03-17 21:57:18 (Friday)
> To: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Cc:
> Subject: [HACKERS] Guidelines for GSoC student proposals
>
> I've found various sources that give hints about what a student
> proposal should look like, but nothing I could just give as a link,
> so I pulled together what I could find, tempered by my own ideas and
> opinions. I suggest that we send the below, or something like it to
> each student who expresses interest in making a proposal, or who
> submits a proposal that doesn't meet the below guidelines. Thoughts
> or suggestions for changes before we do? Remember, time is short,
> so this cannot be a 200 message bike-shedding debate -- we just need
> to provide some sort of guidance to students in a timely way, with
> the timeline being:
>
> February 27 - March 20
> Potential student participants discuss application ideas with
> mentoring organizations
> March 20 16:00 UTC
> Student application period opens
> April 3 16:00 UTC
> Student application deadline
>
> Each GSoC student proposal should be a PDF file of 6 to 8 pages. In
> the end, Google will publish these documents on a web page, so the
> student should make each proposal something which they will be happy
> to have future potential employers review.
>
> Some ideas for desirable content:
>
> - A resume or CV of the student, including any prior GSoC work
> - Their reasons for wanting to participate
> - What else they have planned for the summer, and what their time
> commitment to the GSoC work will be
> - A clear statement that there will be no intellectual property
> problems with the work they will be doing -- that the PostgreSQL
> community will be able to use their work without encumbrances
> (e.g., there should be no agreements related to prior or
> ongoing work which might assign the rights to the work they do
> to someone else)
> - A description of what they will do, and how
> - Milestones with dates
> - What they consider to be the test that they have successfully
> completed the project
>
> Note that a student proposal is supposed to be far more detailed
> than the ideas for projects provided by the organization -- those
> are intended to be ideas for what the student might write up as a
> proposal, not ready-to-go proposal documents.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--
Mengxing Liu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rushabh Lathia 2017-03-22 07:39:22 Re: Possible regression with gather merge.
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2017-03-22 07:18:59 [PATCH] Reduce src/test/recovery verbosity