| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Refactor handling of database attributes between pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
| Date: | 2017-03-29 12:04:38 |
| Message-ID: | 6d50eecb-43a8-ca03-d3d3-35312c078815@proxel.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/29/2017 05:43 AM, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> Updated patch attached.
I get a test failure in the pg_upgrade tests, but I do not have time
right now to investigate.
The failing test is "Restoring database schemas in the new cluster".
I get the following in the log:
command:
"/home/andreas/dev/postgresql/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/install//home/andreas/dev/postgresql-inst/bin/pg_dump"
--host /home/andreas/dev/postgresql/src/bin/pg_upgrade --port 50848
--username andreas --schema-only --quote-all-identifiers
--binary-upgrade --format=custom --file="pg_upgrade_dump_16385.custom"
'dbname='"'"'./0123456789:;<=>?(at)ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'"'"'' >>
"pg_upgrade_dump_16385.log" 2>&1
command:
"/home/andreas/dev/postgresql/src/bin/pg_upgrade/tmp_check/install//home/andreas/dev/postgresql-inst/bin/pg_restore"
--host /home/andreas/dev/postgresql/src/bin/pg_upgrade --port 50848
--username andreas --exit-on-error --verbose --dbname
'dbname='"'"'./0123456789:;<=>?(at)ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'"'"''
"pg_upgrade_dump_16385.custom" >> "pg_upgrade_dump_16385.log" 2>&1
pg_restore: connecting to database for restore
pg_restore: [archiver (db)] connection to database
"./0123456789:;<=>?(at)ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" failed: FATAL: database
"./0123456789:;<=>?(at)ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" does not exist
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rahila Syed | 2017-03-29 12:13:59 | Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning |
| Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2017-03-29 12:03:21 | Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. |