Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-13 01:17:30
Message-ID: 6d149f01-9496-7dc0-4866-3a661e678bc4@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/12/12 23:14, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/7/16 1:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I've committed 0001 - 0006 with that correction and a few other
>> adjustments. There's plenty of room for improvement here, and almost
>> certainly some straight-up bugs too, but I think we're at a point
>> where it will be easier and less error-prone to commit follow on
>> changes incrementally rather than by continuously re-reviewing a very
>> large patch set for increasingly smaller changes.
>
> This page
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/ddl-partitioning.html>,
> which is found via the index entry for "Partitioning", should be updated
> for the new functionality.

A patch was included to do that, but it didn't do more than replacing the
old DDL listing by the new partitioning commands. As Robert said in the
email you quoted, that's not enough. So I'm trying to come up with a
patch updating the page explaining the new functionality better.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-12-13 01:21:27 Re: pgsql: Add support for temporary replication slots
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-13 01:13:17 Re: exposing wait events for non-backends (was: Tracking wait event for latches)