From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions / track_functions |
Date: | 2018-10-05 12:15:30 |
Message-ID: | 6d01afee-2a3b-2871-ef41-d3fcd984b192@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/10/2018 22:07, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-10-04 12:15:28 -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote:
>> Was this intentional, or an oversight?
>>
>> If welcome, I would be happy to work on a patch. Whilst slightly confusing
>> in terms of naming, we could just track this together with functions, since
>> one can always join with pg_proc to determine whether something is a
>> function or a procedure.
>
> Yea, that sounds wrong / not ideal to me. I think we should just fix
> this, should be easy enough.
Here is a patch.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Track-procedure-calls-in-pg_stat_user_functions.patch | text/plain | 1.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-10-05 12:19:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative |
Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2018-10-05 11:38:05 | Re: TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums |