| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
| Date: | 2025-02-26 20:37:47 |
| Message-ID: | 6cac9c19fd64d5a2bd8ecd794ce9e84e9998b814.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2025-02-26 at 15:15 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I strongly agree. I think shipping this feature in any form that uses
> in-place updates is a bad idea.
Removed already in commit f3dae2ae58.
The reason they were added was mostly for consistency with ANALYZE, and
(at least for me) secondarily about churn on pg_class. The bloat was
never terrible.
With that in mind, should we remove the in-place updates from ANALYZE
as well?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmytro Astapov | 2025-02-26 20:44:50 | Re: Relaxing constraints on BitmapAnd eligibility? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-02-26 20:18:45 | Re: Make query cancellation keys longer |