| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, Tim Cross <theophilusx(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Psql_General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: User documentation vs Official Docs |
| Date: | 2018-07-17 00:02:41 |
| Message-ID: | 6c3d7f8d-ec23-3ca5-d756-7dd91bd750e6@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 07/16/2018 04:56 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> 3) Some combination of the editorial board/peer reviewers/other
>> volunteers would periodically go over existing documentation to
>> remove/update stale content.
>
> I did it!
s/did/dig
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
*** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-07-17 00:08:57 | Re: User documentation vs Official Docs |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2018-07-16 23:56:51 | Re: User documentation vs Official Docs |