Re: name difference of rpm packages of postgresql-private-devel-16.6.z

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Ravi Dave <royrvd(dot)dave(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: name difference of rpm packages of postgresql-private-devel-16.6.z
Date: 2025-01-04 21:02:53
Message-ID: 6c2822ee38cd6df4ebf26a2becc60c8ddd850059.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2024-12-30 at 16:53 +0530, Ravi Dave wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I wanted to know the meaning of "private" in postgresql-private-devel-16.6.
> rpm package name. Ideally, I saw postgresql-devel-* rpm packages, so I want to know if there
> is any specific reason for he word private in the name of rpm.

The "private" package was not downloaded from the PostgreSQL download page,
so we don't know anything about it. Probably somebody packaged it for -
well - private use.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Behrens 2025-01-04 23:12:49 Re: search_path for PL/pgSQL functions partially cached?
Previous Message Michel Pelletier 2025-01-04 20:34:40 Re: Using Expanded Objects other than Arrays from plpgsql