From: | Mark Rotteveel <mark(at)lawinegevaar(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pre-processing during build |
Date: | 2015-06-18 06:44:05 |
Message-ID: | 6be9e38a3cfaaba8b8a3f7008cfb6261@imap.procolix.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 23:51:26 +0200, "Markus KARG" <markus(at)headcrashing(dot)eu>
wrote:
> Wrong. 12.1.1 contains more restriction on the initial class than 12.2
> which describes the general process for ANY class. Hence it is a
> difference. That is what you see in the difference of you initial
example
> to mine on Gist. :-)
>
> Sorry I was not aware that you only posted the example to demonstrate
> REFLECTION to fail. Maybe I missed that. I always talked about normal
> instantiation, not about reflection. Also AFAIK JDBC spec does not say
> reflection MUST be possible, does it?
Of course you need to support reflection, in some cases the JVM itself
will use reflection and as I said in an earlier email: a lot of tools and
libraries depend on it. Not supporting reflection will simply make the
driver unusable in a lot of situations.
I can't believe I actually need to argue this point.
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrej Golovnin | 2015-06-18 06:58:14 | Re: Pre-processing during build |
Previous Message | Mark Rotteveel | 2015-06-18 06:37:58 | Re: Pre-processing during build |