From: | Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New archives layout is not an improvement |
Date: | 2018-04-18 22:23:10 |
Message-ID: | 6b6f6642-24a3-89cb-c542-02cdf111cb82@postgrespro.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On an afterthought, I find the way this transition was handled to be
quite surprising.
Say, we have a tool that is used by a fair number of people to read the
Postgres-related discussions. Most commit messages nowadays also link to
it. And one day it's just changed without prior notice (at least I
didn't see one) to a version that is clearly far from complete. Surely
we could at least have the old version live somewhere, while the new one
is being brought into shape?
--
Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-04-19 02:28:09 | Re: Submit button in bug reporting form |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-18 22:22:20 | Re: New archives layout is not an improvement |