Re: New archives layout is not an improvement

From: Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New archives layout is not an improvement
Date: 2018-04-18 22:23:10
Message-ID: 6b6f6642-24a3-89cb-c542-02cdf111cb82@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On an afterthought, I find the way this transition was handled to be
quite surprising.

Say, we have a tool that is used by a fair number of people to read the
Postgres-related discussions. Most commit messages nowadays also link to
it. And one day it's just changed without prior notice (at least I
didn't see one) to a version that is clearly far from complete. Surely
we could at least have the old version live somewhere, while the new one
is being brought into shape?

--

Alexander Kuzmenkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-04-19 02:28:09 Re: Submit button in bug reporting form
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-04-18 22:22:20 Re: New archives layout is not an improvement