From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: contrib promotion? |
Date: | 2006-07-14 17:59:52 |
Message-ID: | 6b4a757ab629564c6d827599715ff01b@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
>> Doesn't our inclusion of md5() pretty much blow that argument away?
>> (Just asking).
>
> I don't think so because md5 is just a one way hash function. There
> is no method to decrypt anything :).
Actually, I've had to install pgcrypto on more than one occasion for
clients who needed to have sha1 instead of md5. I've had to install
pgcrypto for other functions as well, so +1 for me on coring it, but
at the least please consider adding in sha1.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200607141355
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFEt9sfvJuQZxSWSsgRAhrCAJ9VZneUN6+3pvq+vJf+Y6lhjamj/QCfUDYc
+rYM+ITWvhw2dvo2B1hta6g=
=h4aD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2006-07-14 18:08:08 | toast index entries again |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-14 17:58:12 | Re: [PATCHES] [patch 0/9] annual pgcrypto update |