From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, skaurus(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15437: Segfault during insert into declarative partitioned table with a trigger creating partition |
Date: | 2018-11-02 01:54:41 |
Message-ID: | 6b3f62c5-3e8e-a926-a4b2-fa5998400c24@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2018/11/02 8:58, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 01:11:19PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> That seems to be what we are looking for. Let's wait a couple of days
>> and see if anybody else has any input to offer on the matter. I also
>> would like to think about it again once.
>
> And so I did.
>
> s/paritioned/partitioned/ in the new comment of tablecmds.c.
>
> The tests could be designed better. We had better not use the same
> object names across multiple tests. If for a reason or another both
> test suites are moved to the same series when running in parallel, this
> can lead to race conditions which would be annoying to debug. Test
> cases are not much portable as they rely on default partitions and this
> bug happens down to v10, where we need to back-patch. It can be
> changed so as we use FOR VALUES (1) or such in the DDL part of the
> function.
>
> Those are easy enough to fix and improve, and the patch looks good to
> me.
Did you already make those changes yourself and waiting to commit or do
you want me to update the patch?
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-02 02:00:49 | Re: BUG #15475: Views over CITEXT columns return no data |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-11-02 01:29:47 | Re: BUG #15475: Views over CITEXT columns return no data |