Re: objsubid vs subobjid

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: objsubid vs subobjid
Date: 2017-03-01 14:14:21
Message-ID: 6b03029d-16ab-64d6-f8b5-9a75059fd404@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while
> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose
> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be
> nice to fix it.

I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
code. I don't know what the practical use for these functions is.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2017-03-01 14:23:46 Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Previous Message Josh Soref 2017-03-01 14:12:34 Re: Possible spelling fixes