| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | fabianfett(at)mac(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include PostgresNIO Swift client in the Documentation |
| Date: | 2023-08-23 13:57:55 |
| Message-ID: | 6aa3a120-c0f5-42d3-5b63-bfcf5fa8f77b@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 8/23/23 8:41 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 22 Aug 2023, at 16:25, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/22/23 3:10 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>
>>> This is in line with what I imagined as well, so unless anyone thinks otherwise
>>> I will apply this and backpatch it to all branches.
>>
>> I could argue it both ways on whether or not to backpatch. However, given the list of drivers should work with all supported PG releases, and it expands on the current known list, I'd +1 backpatching.
>
> I opted for backpatching as the table is equally incomplete for all branches,
> and the wiki equally applicable.
Agreed; thanks!
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Euler Taveira | 2023-08-23 18:31:04 | Re: There is no description about "Logical Replication also use or occupy max_wal_senders ", |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2023-08-23 13:55:11 | There is no description about "Logical Replication also use or occupy max_wal_senders ", |