Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: richard coleman <rcoleman(dot)ascentgl(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Date: 2023-05-01 15:50:54
Message-ID: 6EF026A5-5CEC-48AB-B27E-C225DAE6E10A@elevated-dev.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On May 1, 2023, at 9:25 AM, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The arguments about "the Unix way" seem to have forgotten the point about being silent except in cases of exception, and this level of detail already violates that premise.

It would be a reasonable convenience. I think some of the pushback is from the framing that not having it is a defect.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message M Sarwar 2023-05-01 15:51:54 Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Previous Message richard coleman 2023-05-01 15:34:50 Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion