| From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Franklin Haut" <franklin(dot)haut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump slow |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 16:15:05 |
| Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD9D4@Herge.rcsinc.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> >Franlin: are you making pg_dump from local or remote box and is this
a
> >clean install? Try fresh patched win2k install and see what happens.
> He claimed this was local, not network. It is certainly an
> intriguing possibility that W2K and WinXP handle bytea
> differently. I'm not competent to comment on that however.
can you make small extraction of this file (~ 100 rows), zip to file and
send to me off list? I'll test it vs. a 2000 and xp server and try to
reproduce your results.
Merlin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-01 16:26:04 | Re: Queries taking ages in PG 8.1, have been much faster in PG<=8.0 |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-01 16:15:00 | Re: 15,000 tables |