Re: [ODBC] ODBC Driver on Windows 64 bit

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [ODBC] ODBC Driver on Windows 64 bit
Date: 2005-09-15 14:01:12
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD352@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Well, pg being a multi-process architecture, on a 64 bit system you get
the advantages of extra memory for cache all day long. I don't thing a
2gb mem limit/backend is not a wall people are hitting very often even
on high end systems. Performance wise, 32 vs. 64 bit is a tug of war
between extra registers & faster 64 bit ops on one side vs. smaller
pointers and better memory footprint on the other.

Note I am assuming Opteron here where the 32/64 performance is basically
the same.

Merlin


That being said, from what I'm hearing it may be moot because
it's probably best to run postgres as 32 bit on a 64 bit operating
system performance wise.


Oh? why's that then?

/D

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message bm\mbn 2005-09-16 11:51:43 RAID Stripe size
Previous Message Jonah H. Harris 2005-09-15 05:08:47 Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer