Re: New form of index "persistent reference"

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New form of index "persistent reference"
Date: 2005-02-10 18:26:34
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7619@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Lately, I have been thinking that a cool form of index would be some
sort
> of "persistent reference" index. Like the old ISAM days of yore, a
fixed
> number could point you right to the row that you want. I'm not sure if
the
> "persistent reference" is a specific auto numbering column type or
> separate index structure or both.

What you are talking about is a 'relative file'. It turns out on modern
ISAM file systems, the win you get over b-tree indexing is not worth
losing the ability to do simple things like run-length compression on
strings.

Anyways, while storing a physical offset is O(1), so is computing a
hash. How would a hash index not fill your need?

Merlin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hicham G. Elmongui 2005-02-10 19:07:03 enforcing a plan (in brief)
Previous Message pgsql 2005-02-10 18:12:19 Re: New form of index "persistent reference"