From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Conway" <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | "PERFORM" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Alexandre Leclerc" <alexandre(dot)leclerc(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Flattening a kind of 'dynamic' table |
Date: | 2005-02-04 17:48:43 |
Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7611@Herge.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
> Alexandre Leclerc wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in on this thread so late -- I haven't been able to
> select * from crosstab(
> 'select product_id, department_id, req_time
> from product_department_time order by 1',
> 'select ''A'' union all select ''C'' union all select ''D'''
> ) as (product_id int, a int, c int, d int);
I forgot you could do this...This would certainly be easier than parsing
array values returned from array_accum. It will probably be faster as
well...but with the array approach the query would not have to be
modified each time a new department was added. That said, a crosstab
based query could be built easily enough from a department query on the
client and then you have the best of both worlds.
Merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sanketh Indarapu | 2005-02-04 19:29:36 | Postgres odbc performance on windows |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-04 04:39:44 | Re: Planner really hates nested loops |