Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: <alex(at)neteconomist(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Date: 2005-01-11 14:44:21
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A75A3@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> $4000 is not going to get you much disk - If you buy components from
> the cheapest source I know (newegg.com) you end up around $5k with
> 14x36gig Raptor SATA drives and a 4U chasis with a 14xSATA built in
> back plane packing 2x9500S AMCC Escalade RAID cards, which are
> supported in Linux, 4Gig RAM and 2xOpteron 242. If you are not CPU
> bound, there isn't much point going to 246. If you want SCSI, then
> you will be paying more. Check out rackmountmart.com for Chasises,
> they have a nice 5U that has a 24xSATA backplane (We will be acquiring
> this in the next few weeks). If you really want to go nuts, they have
> an 8U with 40xSATA backplane.
>
> Alex Turner
> NetEconomist

heh, our apps do tend to be CPU bound. Generally, I think the extra CPU
horsepower is worth the investment until you get to the really high end
cpus.

I definitely agree with all your hardware choices though...seems like
you've hit the 'magic formula'.

Merlin

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rosser Schwarz 2005-01-11 14:52:10 Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Previous Message Alex Turner 2005-01-11 14:34:15 Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?