From: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Derek Dexheimer" <dex3703(at)juno(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Postgres vs. the rest |
Date: | 2004-10-28 18:33:32 |
Message-ID: | 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A750C@Herge.rcsinc.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> Hello,
>
> I am looking into PostgreSQL and am looking for general functional
> information, as well as comparisons to other DBMSes, specifically SQL
vs. mysql: no contest, use pg.
vs. ms sql: on win32 it's a wash (historically it was a rough go on
windows) these days save yourself 10k$ and use pg. If your really
heavily invested in ms tools (especially visual basic, sql server is not
a bad choice).
vs. oracle: use pg, unless you are heavily invested in oracle toolset.
> Server and MySQL. I'd be interested in any general info anybody has.
It'd
> be even better if you were in the Seattle area, so I could talk to
someone
> locally. :)
> I'm curious in that some of the advocacy documents talk about
PostgreSQL
> being 'object-relational'. What does this mean exactly?
Not much. It sort of means 'has features to facilitate mapping to an OO
application paradigm). More and more, though, pg is becoming a sql
dbms. However, it is very programmable. Maybe somebody with more
experience can answer this one better.
> Also, are there any native .NET data providers available for
PostgreSQL?
Check npgsql.
Merlin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2004-10-28 18:47:20 | Re: Postgres vs. the rest |
Previous Message | Vishal Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] | 2004-10-28 18:24:13 | Re: Postgres vs. the rest |