Re: About inheritance

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "elein" <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About inheritance
Date: 2004-06-30 21:39:22
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB34101AEA3@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> Diogo,
>
> > And how about just saying something in the docs like: deprecated ?
> > Or let the code and rip off just the docs about inheritance.
>
> It's not completely broken. It just has some significant
limitations,
> and
> those limitations are not being worked on.
>
> If anything, we should just insert a cautionary note about the
indexing
> issues
> in the docs.

IMO, inheritance is pretty much useless. What it is supposed to do can
be done much better with views, etc. IMO, at the very least inheritance
features should be removed from the tutorial in the docs. They are a
leftover from a different period when postgres was still making the
transition from a 'object relational' dbms to a SQL dbms.

I can't really comment on 'ripping out' strategies, but I don't think
there would be many complaints of inheritance was relegated to a
footnote in the docs and the default GUC setting was defaulted to
'false'.

Merlin

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-06-30 22:55:15 Re: Supported languages
Previous Message elein 2004-06-30 21:24:04 Re: About inheritance