| From: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gordan(at)bobich(dot)net |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
| Date: | 2008-01-18 18:23:30 |
| Message-ID: | 6E2AF622-C58E-4124-BC15-305BCD690318@myemma.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:37 AM, gordan(at)bobich(dot)net wrote:
>>
>> That's one thing. The other problem that most trigger based
>> replication systems have problems with is propogating schema
>> changes - because (I think) you can attach triggers to schema
>> changes.
>
> I presume you mean that you cannot attach triggers to schema
> changes. Yes, I had thought of that a minute ago. I don't suppose
> this could be deemed a feature request for CREATE/ALTER/DROP schema
> level triggers? ;)
I'm sure he did. Also, there was a little bit of discussion a week
or so ago about ddl & ddl/dml (such as TRUNCATE) triggers. With the
imminent release of 8.3, now's the time to pipe up with feature
requests.
Erik Jones
DBA | Emma®
erik(at)myemma(dot)com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)
Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Jones | 2008-01-18 18:30:49 | Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving |
| Previous Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2008-01-18 18:18:06 | Re: Stupid question about WAL archiving |