| From: | Travis P <twp(at)castle(dot)fastmail(dot)fm> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-01-19 15:33:12 |
| Message-ID: | 6E075FE7-6A2F-11D9-A91A-003065F9DAF8@castle.fastmail.fm |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 19, 2005, at 4:54 AM, Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD wrote:
> Another algorithm that was written by
> university folk (thus probably not patent prone) that looks promising
> is:
> http://www.cs.wm.edu/hpcs/WWW/HTML/publications/papers/TR-02-6.pdf
> http://parapet.ee.princeton.edu/~sigm2002/papers/p31-jiang.pdf (same,
> but better typeset)
Do not assume that University algorithms are not patent protected.
They definitely may be and I know they sometimes are.
Princeton has an office dedicated to the issue:
http://www.princeton.edu/patents/
-Travis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-01-19 16:16:38 | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |
| Previous Message | Mark Cave-Ayland | 2005-01-19 14:59:17 | Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*) |