From: | "Philippe Lang" <philippe(dot)lang(at)attiksystem(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
Subject: | Re: TCP_NO_DELAY & TcpAckFrequency (Re: Slow query through |
Date: | 2006-02-13 07:46:01 |
Message-ID: | 6C0CF58A187DA5479245E0830AF84F421D096B@poweredge.attiksystem.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Hi,
Why don't you use tcpdump, or another sniffer, in order to check that, and
post the result here?
-----Message d'origine-----
De : pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] De la part de Arnaud Lesauvage
Envoyé : vendredi, 10. février 2006 17:01
À : Tom Lane
Cc : pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Objet : Re: [ODBC] TCP_NO_DELAY & TcpAckFrequency (Re: Slow query through
Tom Lane a écrit :
> None of this explains why odbc is slow when psql isn't, though,
> especially not if you are using one of the recent odbc releases that
> relies on libpq. The wire-level behavior certainly ought to be the
> same for anything using libpq ...
Yes.
I am trying to figure out what the difference is between an ODBC call and a
"direct" call, from another application...
The issue might be at a higher level, but I have no clue right now...
Regards
--
Arnaud
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-13 08:32:42 | Re: ODBC Driver Version Compatibility with PostgreSQL Database Cluster Version |
Previous Message | simon smith | 2006-02-11 16:19:27 | odbc driver update issues |