Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
Date: 2006-09-20 10:41:35
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA356DA@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > if I look into my cvs repository directory, it shows only
> gram.y,v,
> > with gram.c,v in Attic - which seems to make sense. Must be my
> client
> > that's gone crazy. In fact, mmy output ends up as:
> >
> > Index: src\backend\parser/gram.c
> >
> ===================================================================
> > RCS file:
> > c:/prog/cvsrepo/pgsql/pgsql/src/backend/parser/Attic/gram.c,v
> > retrieving revision 2.90
> > diff -c -r2.90 gram.c
> > *** src\backend\parser/gram.c 7 May 1999 01:22:54 -0000
> 2.90
> > --- src\backend\parser/gram.c 14 Sep 2006 06:10:08 -0000
> >
> >
> > So I guess the question is down to why the hell it's looking at
> the
> > attic file at all. When I run cvs update on it, I get things
> like:
>
> Hmm, maybe you did a "cvs add" for that file at some point?

I very much doubt that. Especially since it asks me to do that whenever
I 'cvs diff'.

> What does your CVS/Entries file look for that dir?

It does contain both gram.c and gram.y. They look just the same (except
for version and date, of course). I don't know how it got there ;-) Is
it safe to just remove that?

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2006-09-20 10:54:14 pg_upgrade: downgradebility
Previous Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-20 10:28:54 Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schaber 2006-09-20 12:11:32 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta)
Previous Message Jeremy Drake 2006-09-20 09:59:38 Re: [PATCHES] Patch for UUID datatype (beta)