From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BF Failure on Bandicoot |
Date: | 2006-08-18 13:14:48 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35551@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Just guessing from the function name, but does this go away if you
> don't configure --with-ldap?
>
> If so it's presumably a portability issue in this recent patch:
>
> 2006-03-06 12:41 momjian
>
> * configure, configure.in, src/backend/libpq/auth.c,
> src/backend/libpq/hba.c,
> src/backend/libpq/pg_hba.conf.sample,
> src/include/pg_config.h.in, src/include/libpq/hba.h: This
> patch
> adds native LDAP auth, for those platforms that don't have
> PAM
> (such as Win32, but also unixen without PAM). On Unix, uses
> OpenLDAP. On win32, uses the builin WinLDAP library.
>
> Magnus Hagander
>
> I'd counsel just leaving --with-ldap off until Magnus gets back
> from vacation. We can always revert the patch later if he can't
> fix it.
> (There's some fairly ugly stuff going on at lines 69-89 of
> backend/libpq/auth.c, which I bet is the root of the trouble, but
> I'm not going to dig further --- I've wasted more than enough time
> on Windows this week ;-))
Looking at the MSDN documentation it seems this function only exists on
Windows 2003 and Windows XP. Which is very interesting, because I have
it working on one of my 2000 boxes. But I guess I got it through some
patch or other.
I'm going to have to redo it to dynamically load that function and exit
with a proper error message if it's not found. Shouldn't be too hard,
I'll get to it as soon as I can get down for a coding session.
The ugly stuff I assume is the stuff about the mingw broken headers? If
so, no, not related in any way.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-18 13:25:08 | Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-08-18 13:11:26 | Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-08-18 13:50:33 | Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-18 12:52:03 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch |