| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Subject: | Re: Design Considerations for New Authentication Methods |
| Date: | 2006-11-03 21:52:21 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FCF3@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> To be honest, I have often wondered *why* we support
> kerberos outside
> >> of the uber l33t geek factor. I have not once in a commercial
> >> deployment had a business requirement for the beast. LDAP?
> Now that
> >> is a whole other issue :)
> >
> > Single sign-on in a Windows/AD environment (I'm talking clients on
> > windows, servers on linux here - at least in my case). I
> know several
> > people who use it, most just don't post here ;-)
>
> Wouldn't the LDAP auth in 8.2 resolve that?
No. LDAP gives me single credentials, but not single sign-on. I still
have to enter my password every time I connect.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-11-03 23:09:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in WAL backup documentation |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-11-03 18:03:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Index greater than 8k |