Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Include file in regress.c
Date: 2006-09-24 20:25:39
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FBE5@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> > That definitely looks weird to me. Unfortunatly, it's way
> above me wrt
> > CVS knowledge. I'm just going to have to live with it and
> remember to
> > delete that part from my diffs...
>
> The weird thing is that it's not happening for other people.
> Have you tried blowing away the whole tree and doing a fresh
> checkout? What CVS version are you using?

Haven't tried that, but I will eventually (need to clean up some of the
stuff I have in the tree first). I'm on:

Concurrent Versions System (CVSNT) 2.5.02 (Servalan) Build 2064
(client/server)
CVSNT version (Aug 19 2005) Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Tony Hoyle and
others

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-09-24 20:47:09 Re: pgsql: We're going to have to spell dotless i
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-09-24 19:54:35 Windows build farm failures

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremy Drake 2006-09-24 22:19:12 Re: [HACKERS] large object regression tests
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-24 17:21:04 Re: Bad bug in fopen() wrapper code