From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is CVS server so slow? |
Date: | 2006-05-24 19:18:07 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F9BB@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 08:30:36PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>> I'm logged on daily interactively, and haven't noticed
> any issues ...
> >
> >> Are you both referring to the same server? I've noticed that
> >> anoncvs.postgresql.org (66.98.251.159) has been slow for a
> couple of
> >> days -- it just took over five minutes to do a cvs update of HEAD
> >> where it usually takes thirty seconds or less.
> >
> > Yeah, I was about to say the same. The master CVS server
> has been OK
> > (not great, but OK) for the last week or so; but I believe
> the folks
> > complaining are using anoncvs.
>
> Anyone noticing any network issues? I just looked over the
> server itself, swapping a *little* bit, but vmstat shows the
> disks aren't busy ... and nothing unusual taking up CPU on
> the server itself ...
anoncvs is on svr4, right? It's been dead slow due to spam getting
trapped in a loop because of configuration errors (see other mails with
details on what we need to do to fix that).
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-24 19:25:26 | Re: Further reduction of bufmgr lock contention |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-05-24 19:16:23 | Re: Why is CVS server so slow? |