Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
Date: 2006-03-22 22:17:34
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F89D@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> There's also a licensing issue which is that pgAdmin is GPL,
> while we're trying to make sure that all contrib modules are
> licensed the same as the core server.

No, pgAdmin is Artistic License, not GPL.

Still not BSD, tough, so the argument still holds even if the difference
isn't as big.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-03-22 22:18:09 Re: Old pg_xlog files
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-03-22 22:12:03 Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary