From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() |
Date: | 2006-02-26 14:58:29 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F7EA@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > > > > Sound good to pass PGconn to new-PQescapeString. Here is the
> > > > > proposed calling sequence for the new function:
> > > > >
> > > > > size_t PQescapeStringWithConn (const PGconn *conn, char
> > > *to, const
> > > > > char *from, size_t length)
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is ok, I will implement for 8.2.
> > >
> > > Here is the promised patches for 8.2. If there's no objection, I
> > > will commit tomorrow.
> >
> > Just a reminder - to work on win32, the new function needs
> an entry in
> > exports.txt.
>
> Thanks. Could you tell me what the number column in the file
> is? Can I assign arbitary number for the function? (maybe
> next to the last
> number?) I'm not familiar with win32 build.
It just has to be unique, and never change for each function. So just
assign the next one in sequence.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-02-26 16:00:46 | Re: TOAST compression |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-02-26 14:40:33 | Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString() |